<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Buzz Marketing Stats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deanhunt.com/buzz-marketing-stats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deanhunt.com/buzz-marketing-stats/</link>
	<description>The highly acclaimed and controversial Internet Entrepreur Dean Hunt shares his off-beat views on success, marketing, personal development and some wacky humour.  Why? Because everyone is entitled to his opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 06:38:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dean Hunt</title>
		<link>http://deanhunt.com/buzz-marketing-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-48958</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Hunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanhunt.com/buzz-marketing-stats/#comment-48958</guid>
		<description>Chris, fair point!

When I first started the live buzz campaign I wasn&#039;t overly bothered whether it got on the main page or not. Sure, it would have been nice, but it can also be a lottery at times.

To date the Digg article has almost 900 diggs, I sent the email to just my core newsletter readers, so off the top of my head it is around 100 core people. Of which, less than half opened, plus, there were broken links, so my guess is that YES, it helped, but marginally.

Some really powerful digg users voted for it, and imo that meant that this was hitting the homepage with or without that email.

But yes, your point is valid, and I will ensure I mention that in any summary to make sure people are aware.

Dean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, fair point!</p>
<p>When I first started the live buzz campaign I wasn&#8217;t overly bothered whether it got on the main page or not. Sure, it would have been nice, but it can also be a lottery at times.</p>
<p>To date the Digg article has almost 900 diggs, I sent the email to just my core newsletter readers, so off the top of my head it is around 100 core people. Of which, less than half opened, plus, there were broken links, so my guess is that YES, it helped, but marginally.</p>
<p>Some really powerful digg users voted for it, and imo that meant that this was hitting the homepage with or without that email.</p>
<p>But yes, your point is valid, and I will ensure I mention that in any summary to make sure people are aware.</p>
<p>Dean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://deanhunt.com/buzz-marketing-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-48935</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 07:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanhunt.com/buzz-marketing-stats/#comment-48935</guid>
		<description>Dean - the results are impressive and definatley display why we need to pay attention to buzz marketing and social marketing.

I do have one question and fact to point out - this live case study is not 100% pure as you did send out to your mailing list the link to the article and commented on how you are trying to get some buzz.  I am sure that your loyal fans (myself included) helped you out by digging the article or submitting it to Stumble or someother social network.  

I have no doubt that the article still would have been a success and generated some buzz but do you think it would have been this good without sending the letter to your subscribers and just posted the article on the blog and let it generate its own buzz?

still either way the results are impressive</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dean &#8211; the results are impressive and definatley display why we need to pay attention to buzz marketing and social marketing.</p>
<p>I do have one question and fact to point out &#8211; this live case study is not 100% pure as you did send out to your mailing list the link to the article and commented on how you are trying to get some buzz.  I am sure that your loyal fans (myself included) helped you out by digging the article or submitting it to Stumble or someother social network.  </p>
<p>I have no doubt that the article still would have been a success and generated some buzz but do you think it would have been this good without sending the letter to your subscribers and just posted the article on the blog and let it generate its own buzz?</p>
<p>still either way the results are impressive</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Korey King</title>
		<link>http://deanhunt.com/buzz-marketing-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-48922</link>
		<dc:creator>Korey King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 04:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanhunt.com/buzz-marketing-stats/#comment-48922</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve got my attention Dean.
Hold the hex, I subbed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve got my attention Dean.<br />
Hold the hex, I subbed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
